mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2025-08-05 09:55:20 +02:00
fix: consider issues in repository accessible via access
table (#7270)
- Consider the following scenario: a private repository in an organization with a team that has no specific access to that repository. Members of that team are still able to visit the repository because of entries in the `access` table.
- Consider this specific scenario for the gathering of issues for project tables.
- Unit test added
- Resolves forgejo/forgejo#7217
- Ref: forgejo/forgejo#6843
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
(cherry picked from commit 72ee7f3b00
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
400bd08cfe
commit
c1e9fd738b
6 changed files with 92 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ func issuePullAccessibleRepoCond(repoIDstr string, userID int64, org *organizati
|
|||
builder.Or(
|
||||
repo_model.UserOrgUnitRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID, org.ID, unitType), // team member repos
|
||||
repo_model.UserOrgPublicUnitRepoCond(userID, org.ID), // user org public non-member repos, TODO: check repo has issues
|
||||
builder.And(
|
||||
builder.In("issue.repo_id", builder.Select("id").From("repository").Where(builder.Eq{"owner_id": org.ID})),
|
||||
repo_model.UserAccessRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID)), // user can access org repo in a unit independent way
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue