This change is very similar to what was done in forgejo/forgejo#7727. When a PR is updated, `checkIfPRContentChanged` is called to check if the diff changed - this is done on a temporary repository. This change improves this checking by doing this operation on the bare repository. The change is split into several commits.
The following changes were made (in this exact order)
1. Update the `getTestPatchCtx` function that was introduced in forgejo/forgejo#7727 so it can be used outside the context of conflict checking. This is a simple change by making the caller determine if it can use a bare repository or not.
2. Do a small refactor of `ValidatePullRequest` to avoid indentation hell in this function, this is purely a refactor but necessary to not blow my brain while working on this function.
3. The first enhancement, introduce `testPatchCtx` in `ValidatePullRequest` to get diverging commits via the bare repository.
4. The main enhancement, do a refactor to move the function to be part of the repository struct and do a rename as this fits as a general purpose function. This refactoring includes it no longer being specific to a temporary repository and works on a bare repository.
5. Add extensive units tests, integration tests are added in forgejo/forgejo#8450 it checks that both calls to `CheckIfDiffDiffers` work. Because it also fixes a bug I sent it as a different PR.
6. Extend the integration test to check for diffs with commits from different repositories, to demonstrate that `getTestPatchCtx` works (specifically the `env` variable).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8451
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
The argument order for `ValidatePullRequest` is to first give the new commitID and then the old commit ID.
This results in reviews not being marked as stale when they are not stale and reviews as not stale when they are stale. The test will fail if the fix is not present.
Add testing for the following three scenarios:
1. A review is made, the PR is updated and as a consequence the PR's diff is changed. The review is now marked as stale.
2. A review is made but in the meantime the PR is updated and the review is submitted on a older commit ID. If the diff changed the review is marked as stale.
3. A review that was made against a older commit ID is no longer marked as stale if the PR is force-pushed to that older commit ID.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8450
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Currently the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents` API endpoint accepts request without any `ChangeFileOperation.SHA`, unlike stated by the doc:
33eee199cf/modules/structs/repo_file.go (L80-L81)
This PR adds:
- some more (already passing) tests around this function
- a new (failing) test to show this wrong behavior
- a fix (note that this is a breaking change for clients exploiting this bug)
- an update for all the existing tests
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Breaking bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139): <!--number 8139 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QVBJOiBlbmZvcmNlIHNoYSByZXF1aXJlbWVudCBvbiBgUE9TVCAvcmVwb3Mve293bmVyfS97cmVwb30vY29udGVudHNg-->API: enforce sha requirement on `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents`<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
The only parameter that is ever used is a single directory, make it that only instead of a more complex option structure.
Remove tests.AddFixtures that was the simpler form because it is now redundant.
---
Backporting to v11.0 will help with automated backporting of bug fixes in need of custom made fixtures.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7648
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- Replies to pending review comments no longer generate a notification, this was caused by an incomplete determination if the comment was part of the pending review or not.
- The logic was reworked to do the following if it's part of a pending review: It is not a single review and if it's a reply then the comment it is replying to is part of a pending review.
- Added integration test.
- Resolves forgejo/forgejo#7151
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7167
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
* disable the "Finish review" button on PR/files page for archived repos - trying to review PRs in such repos results in JS error
* wrap the button in a div and move tooltips here to make them actually display on a disabled button - currently they do not
* added simple testing
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6729
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Render the issue titles in dashboard feed in consistent manner, by using the existing `RenderIssueTitle`.
- Added integration tests (not exhaustive for all comment types, but exhaustive enough for the current code where some comment types are grouped together).
- Resolves forgejo/forgejo#6705
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6715
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Merge tests together.
- Remove unecessary usage of `onGiteaRun`.
- Make proper use of `unittest`.
- Make proper use of `test.MockVariable`.
- I have not checked all of the testing files yet.
This reverts commit 4ed372af13.
This change from Gitea was not considered by the Forgejo UI team and there is a consensus that it feels like a regression.
The test which was added in that commit is kept and modified to test that reviews can successfully be submitted on closed and merged PRs.
Closes forgejo/design#11
ForkRepository performs two different functions:
* The fork itself, if it does not already exist
* Updates and notifications after the fork is performed
The function is split to reflect that and otherwise unmodified.
The two function are given different names to:
* clarify which integration tests provides coverage
* distinguish it from the notification method by the same name
Replace #25741
Close #24445
Close #30658
Close #20646
~Depends on #30805~
Since #25741 has been rewritten totally, to make the contribution
easier, I will continue the work in this PR. Thanks @6543
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit c6cf96d31d80ab79d370a6192fd761b4443daec2)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/editor_test.go
trivial context conflict because of 75ce1e2ac1 [GITEA] Allow user to select email for file operations in Web UI
tests/integration/pull_merge_test.go
trivial context conflicts in imports because more tests were added in Forgejo
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28297
This PR also fixed a problem that it needs a database transaction when
removing the WIP title.
---
Resolves #2771
Also partially ports gitea#29783
(cherry picked from commit 17d7ab5ad4ce3d0fbc1251572c22687c237a30b1)
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)
One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).
To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
